EU
This is an ambitious outcome with stronger language
But we’re unhappy with ‘invites’ in the mitigation aspect of the ‘decisions’ text, esp para 22, 23, 24. These must be replaced by ‘shall’
Aviation and shipping emissions are missing
China
References to voluntary ‘south south’ finance should be deleted
Not happy with concept of ‘climate neutrality’ (3.1)
Wants to see ‘global review’ (3.8) deleted
References to a ‘shared effort by all parties (6.2) in the finance section seek to “shift responsibilities” and must be deleted
India
Peaking of parties GHG emissions not acceptable, it should say ‘global emissions’ (3.1)
Five year review cycles are “a matter of choice”
Not happy with finance section… words developed should help “facilitating the mobilisation” of $ are not acceptable, it should just say ‘mobilise’
Finance and support should be scaled up
US
The document is already a ‘monument to differentiation’, all INDCs are different and no two are the same
Kyoto failed because it tried a one-size fits all, this is a new approach
This is *all* voluntary
Support 5 year cycles
Language in decisions text on mitigation needs to be stronger (change from invites to shall)
Support a long term goal and neutrality in the second half of the century